Godex vs StealthEX: which fits your use case?
Both Godex and StealthEX launched in 2018, skip KYC, and use a hybrid rate model with case-by-case refund handling. They land at the same overall score (B), but the core architectural difference matters: Godex operates as a custodial aggregator, while StealthEX is non-custodial and routes orders to partner liquidity providers without holding user funds beyond the swap window.
- Pick Godex if you want a single aggregated quote across 930+ assets, value the 14-day data deletion policy, and don't mind the custodial-aggregator model for the duration of the swap.
- Pick StealthEX if you prefer a non-custodial flow, need access to a wider catalogue (2000+ assets), or want minimal exposure to a single operator holding funds.
On rates, neither is universally cheaper; hybrid pricing means quotes depend on the pair, route, and whether you choose fixed or floating. Refund policies are similar on paper, but non-custodial routing on StealthEX can simplify recovery when a partner provider is involved.
Recommendation: compare live quotes for your exact pair on both before committing. For privacy-maximalist swaps, StealthEX's non-custodial model has a slight edge; for users who prefer an aggregator UX with a longer asset history, Godex remains a solid pick.