LetsExchange vs Exolix: which aggregator fits your swap?
Both services operate as custodial aggregators with hybrid rate models (fixed or floating) and case-by-case refund policies. Neither requires registration or KYC, and both route orders through multiple liquidity providers rather than holding their own order books.
The main practical differences are scope and track record. LetsExchange advertises a wider catalog (around 5,980 assets across 300+ networks) and emphasizes cross-chain bridging, which is useful if you regularly move between less common chains. Exolix has been operating since 2018, two years longer than LetsExchange, with a narrower but still broad list of roughly 2,600 assets and a strong focus on transparent transaction tracking.
- Pick LetsExchange if you need exotic tokens, multi-network coverage, or cross-chain swaps in a single flow.
- Pick Exolix if you prefer a longer operational history and a simpler, more focused asset list.
On custody risk they are comparable: funds pass through the aggregator during the swap, and stuck or flagged transactions are handled manually. Recommendation: for mainstream pairs, quote both with the same amount and pick the better net rate; for long-tail tokens or bridging, LetsExchange is more likely to have a route.